Paramount Group, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- +$3.86B
- Cash
- −$375.06M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: PGRE stock price vs TJX: inconclusive — current versus $8.22 implied using P/S multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at TJX's multiple
Implied fair value · at PGRE's multiple
Needs PGRE P/S.
Snapshot Sep 4, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: PGRE FY 2024 (ended Dec 31, 2024) · TJX FY 2026 (ended Jan 31, 2026). Fiscal years are not aligned.
Trendline
12 fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Capital structure 98% equity / 2% debt · EV / Revenue 2.35x · EV / EBITDA 19.05x
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
PARAMOUNT GROUP, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
The TJX Companies, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
1.23x
0.28x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
28.53x
-0.45x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$375.06M
$6.23B
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
BXP, Inc.
PGRE vs BXP
SL GREEN REALTY CORP
PGRE vs SLG
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
PGRE vs VNO
KILROY REALTY CORP
PGRE vs KRC
ALEXANDRIA REAL ESTATE EQUITIES, INC.
PGRE vs ARE
ROSS STORES, INC.
PGRE vs ROST
Burlington Stores, Inc.
PGRE vs BURL
NORDSTROM INC
PGRE vs JWN
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW
PGRE vs COST
TARGET CORP
PGRE vs TGT
$3.86B
$2.87B
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe PGRE can materially improve profitability and de-lever its balance sheet, then TJX-implied framework may justify a more constructive view; otherwise, the weaker growth, negative earnings, and 28.4x net debt/EBITDA argue for caution because the DCF range of $3.13-$4.23 is much lower than TJX-implied $9.64-$9.64.
The provided valuation outputs are internally inconsistent but still point to a wide gap between TJX-implied price of $9.64-$9.64 and the DCF range of $3.13-$4.23. That suggests PGRE’s valuation is highly sensitive to the chosen methodology, with TJX-based P/S framework implying a much higher value than the DCF.
Supporting Metrics