Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: PGRE stock price vs AME: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AME's multiple
Needs AME P/S.
Implied fair value · at PGRE's multiple
Needs PGRE P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Ten period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
PARAMOUNT GROUP, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
AMETEK INC/ · implied price per share
Bear
$78.63
Base
$93.91
Bull
$113.81
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
BXP, Inc.
PGRE vs BXP
SL GREEN REALTY CORP
PGRE vs SLG
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
PGRE vs VNO
KILROY REALTY CORP
PGRE vs KRC
ALEXANDRIA REAL ESTATE EQUITIES, INC.
PGRE vs ARE
Parker-Hannifin Corp
PGRE vs PH
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
PGRE vs HON
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO
PGRE vs EMR
CURTISS WRIGHT CORP
PGRE vs CW
Avery Dennison Corp
PGRE vs AVY
METTLER TOLEDO INTERNATIONAL INC/
PGRE vs MTD
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe PGRE can materially improve profitability and rapidly reduce leverage, then avoid relying on the $25.30 implied P/S valuation because the DCF range of $3.13-$4.23 and weak operating metrics do not currently support it.
The valuation setup is highly disconnected: PGRE's implied price from the P/S multiple is $25.30, while the DCF range is only $3.13 to $4.23. Compared with AME's much stronger profitability and growth profile, the premium implied by the relative valuation appears difficult to justify.
Supporting Metrics
