Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: PG stock price vs L: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at L's multiple
Needs L P/E.
Implied fair value · at PG's multiple
Needs PG P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
The Procter & Gamble Company · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
LOEWS CORP · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO
PG vs CL
KIMBERLY CLARK CORP
PG vs KMB
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO INC /DE/
PG vs CHD
CLOROX CO /DE/
PG vs CLX
Johnson & Johnson
PG vs JNJ
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC
PG vs BRK-B
MARKEL GROUP INC.
PG vs MKL
CNA FINANCIAL CORP
PG vs CNA
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
PG vs AIG
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
PG vs GE
3M CO
PG vs MMM
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe PG can reaccelerate growth and sustain its current margin/ROIC profile, then hold or buy selectively, because its quality is strong despite the premium; otherwise, trim or avoid exposure because the current price implies 34.5% downside versus the P/E-based value estimate and sits above the DCF range.
PG’s current price of $144.97 implies a 34.5% downside to the P/E-based implied price of $94.95, indicating the stock screens as expensive on this relative basis. The premium is also visible versus L on all major trading multiples, even though PG’s profitability is better.
Supporting Metrics
