Pg&E Corp
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$713.00M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: PCG stock price vs NI: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at NI's multiple
Needs NI P/E.
Implied fair value · at PCG's multiple
Needs PCG P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
14 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
PG&E CORP · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
NISOURCE INC. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
SEMPRA
PCG vs SRE
Duke Energy CORP
PCG vs DUK
COMCAST CORP
PCG vs CMCSA
DTE ENERGY CO
PCG vs DTE
PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INC
PCG vs PEG
NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO
PCG vs NFG
CENTERPOINT ENERGY INC
PCG vs CNP
ATMOS ENERGY CORP
PCG vs ATO
DOMINION ENERGY, INC
PCG vs D
UGI CORP /PA/
PCG vs UGI
FIRSTENERGY CORP
PCG vs FE
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe PCG can improve growth, margins, and leverage without damaging earnings quality, then the current discount to NI may be attractive because PCG already trades below both NI-implied and DCF ranges; otherwise, NI appears fundamentally stronger and PCG's lower multiple may be justified.
PCG trades at 14.7x P/E versus NI at 22.8x and 1.9x P/S versus 3.3x for NI, so it is cheaper on earnings and sales multiples. However, PCG also carries materially higher leverage and weaker operating quality, which helps explain why the market is not awarding it NI’s multiple.
Supporting Metrics