Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: PARA stock price vs CHTR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CHTR's multiple
Needs Revenue / share, CHTR P/S.
Implied fair value · at PARA's multiple
Needs Revenue / share, PARA P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Paramount Skydance Corp · implied price per share
Bear
-$12.23
Base
-$11.43
Bull
-$10.17
Charter Communications, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
COMCAST CORP
PARA vs CMCSA
Walt Disney Co
PARA vs DIS
NETFLIX INC
PARA vs NFLX
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
PARA vs WBD
Fox Corp
PARA vs FOXA
NEWS CORP
PARA vs NWSA
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
PARA vs LUMN
AT&T INC.
PARA vs T
T-Mobile US, Inc.
PARA vs TMUS
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
PARA vs VZ
Clearfield, Inc.
PARA vs CLFD
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe PARA can materially improve margins and restore positive earnings toward CHTR-like profitability, then consider the implied $31.55 P/S-based valuation as potentially achievable, because the current data otherwise shows PARA remains far weaker on margins, ROIC, and quality.
The only stated valuation output is an implied price of $31.55 using a P/S multiple, but there is no current price or upside/downside to show that PARA is trading at a discount. On a relative basis, CHTR already trades at 0.7x P/S and 4.0x P/E, so the data does not support a clear case that PARA deserves a rerating above a mature, profitable CHTR.
Supporting Metrics
