Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: PANW stock price vs RBBN: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at RBBN's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, RBBN P/E.
Implied fair value · at PANW's multiple
Needs PANW P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Palo Alto Networks Inc · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
RIBBON COMMUNICATIONS INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
PANW · not enough data.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
PANW vs CRWD
Zscaler, Inc.
PANW vs ZS
Okta, Inc.
PANW vs OKTA
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD
PANW vs CHKP
Rapid7, Inc.
PANW vs RPD
Cisco Systems, Inc.
PANW vs CSCO
CIENA CORP
PANW vs CIEN
EXTREME NETWORKS INC
PANW vs EXTR
F5, INC.
PANW vs FFIV
Ubiquiti Inc.
PANW vs UI
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe PANW can sustain its 14.9% revenue growth and 13.5% operating margin, then avoid using RBBN-style multiples to value it because PANW's superior profitability and ROIC justify a premium despite the elevated price.
PANW's current price of $331.83 implies a P/E-based value of only $15.56, which suggests a -95.3% downside versus the quoted price. The gap is extreme, but the comparison is distorted because PANW trades on much stronger fundamentals than RBBN.
Supporting Metrics
