Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: PANW stock price vs MSFT: inconclusive — current versus $10.78 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MSFT's multiple
Implied fair value · at PANW's multiple
Needs PANW P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
MICROSOFT CORP · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
PANW vs CRWD
Zscaler, Inc.
PANW vs ZS
Okta, Inc.
PANW vs OKTA
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD
PANW vs CHKP
Rapid7, Inc.
PANW vs RPD
Cisco Systems, Inc.
PANW vs CSCO
Apple Inc.
PANW vs AAPL
Alphabet Inc.
PANW vs GOOGL
AMAZON COM INC
PANW vs AMZN
ADOBE INC.
PANW vs ADBE
NVIDIA CORP
PANW vs NVDA
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe PANW can sustain a much higher long-term operating margin and justify a large premium to MSFT, then hold or accumulate only selectively; otherwise, the current pricing looks difficult to defend because PANW trades at 207.4x earnings and 29.3x sales despite materially weaker profitability.
PANW trades at a large premium to MSFT on both earnings and revenue-based multiples despite a much smaller scale and weaker profitability profile. The implied price of $43.11 versus the current price of $331.83 suggests 87.0% downside, while the current price sits above the top of MSFT-implied range and near the upper end of the historical band.
Supporting Metrics
