Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: OGS stock price vs ATO: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ATO's multiple
Needs ATO P/E.
Implied fair value · at OGS's multiple
Needs OGS P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Ten period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
ONE Gas, Inc. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
ATMOS ENERGY CORP · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
NEW JERSEY RESOURCES CORP
OGS vs NJR
Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.
OGS vs SWX
Northwest Natural Holding Co
OGS vs NWN
CENTERPOINT ENERGY INC
OGS vs CNP
DOMINION ENERGY, INC
OGS vs D
NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO
OGS vs NFG
Evergy, Inc.
OGS vs EVRG
ALLIANT ENERGY CORP
OGS vs LNT
NRG ENERGY, INC.
OGS vs NRG
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe OGS can convert its stronger revenue growth into higher margins without materially increasing leverage, then the stock looks like a selective buy because it trades at a meaningful discount to the P/E-implied value and below ATO on every listed valuation multiple.
OGS trades at $77.65 versus a P/E-implied value of $101.21, suggesting about 30.3% upside on that framework. However, the discount is less compelling when viewed against ATO’s much richer profitability and higher trading multiples, which help justify ATO’s premium.
Supporting Metrics
