Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: ODFL stock price vs CSCO: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CSCO's multiple
Needs CSCO P/E.
Implied fair value · at ODFL's multiple
Needs ODFL P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$53.74
Base
$63.17
Bull
$75.45
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$32.30
Base
$38.62
Bull
$46.85
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
FEDEX CORP
ODFL vs FDX
United Parcel Service, Inc.
ODFL vs UPS
HUNT J B TRANSPORT SERVICES INC
ODFL vs JBHT
RYDER SYSTEM INC
ODFL vs R
CIENA CORP
ODFL vs CIEN
Palo Alto Networks Inc
ODFL vs PANW
JUNIPER NETWORKS INC
ODFL vs JNPR
Fortinet, Inc.
ODFL vs FTNT
Arista Networks, Inc.
ODFL vs ANET
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
ODFL vs LDOS
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe ODFL can re-accelerate revenue growth while preserving its superior margin and ROIC profile, then holding or adding makes sense because the stock is only modestly below CSCO-implied value and carries very low balance-sheet risk.
ODFL’s current price of $211.52 sits just 4.0% below the P/E-implied value of $219.91, so the relative valuation gap is modest rather than compelling. Against the wider valuation context, ODFL trades at a lower EV/EBITDA than CSCO but roughly similar P/E and P/S multiples, suggesting the market is already recognizing its quality profile.
Supporting Metrics
