Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: O stock price vs DLR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at DLR's multiple
Needs DLR P/E.
Implied fair value · at O's multiple
Needs O P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
REALTY INCOME CORPORATION · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
DIGITAL REALTY TRUST, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
NNN REIT, INC.
O vs NNN
AGREE REALTY CORP
O vs ADC
W. P. Carey Inc.
O vs WPC
ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC.
O vs EPRT
LTC PROPERTIES INC
O vs LTC
EQUINIX INC
O vs EQIX
IRON MOUNTAIN INC
O vs IRM
Prologis, Inc.
O vs PLD
Public Storage
O vs PSA
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES INC
O vs AVB
SBA COMMUNICATIONS CORP
O vs SBAC
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe O's modest earnings-based discount and near-midpoint placement in its historical band can persist despite only average quality signals, then hold or accumulate selectively because the valuation downside looks limited at -1.6% and leverage is low at 0.1x debt/equity.
O's current price of $63.48 is just below the P/E-implied price of $62.49, indicating only a -1.6% downside on this framework. Relative to DLR, O trades at a slightly higher P/E but a lower P/S and materially lower EV/EBITDA, suggesting valuation is not stretched on every metric.
Supporting Metrics
