Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: NTAP stock price vs JNPR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at JNPR's multiple
Needs JNPR P/E.
Implied fair value · at NTAP's multiple
Needs NTAP P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Ten period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
NetApp, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$88.82
Base
$102.84
Bull
$121.94
JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$16.15
Base
$19.35
Bull
$23.51
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Pure Storage, Inc.
NTAP vs PSTG
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
NTAP vs IBM
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
NTAP vs MU
Dell Technologies Inc.
NTAP vs DELL
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
NTAP vs STX
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co
NTAP vs HPE
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NTAP vs CSCO
Palo Alto Networks Inc
NTAP vs PANW
Fortinet, Inc.
NTAP vs FTNT
VERISIGN INC/CA
NTAP vs VRSN
Match Group, Inc.
NTAP vs MTCH
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe NTAP can sustain its 5.6% revenue growth and high margin profile, then holding or accumulating on weakness is reasonable because NTAP's profitability and quality metrics are materially stronger than JNPR's despite a valuation that is already above DCF range estimates.
NTAP trades at 28.1x P/E and 5.6x P/S, reflecting a premium that is supported by much stronger profitability than JNPR but still leaves the stock looking expensive relative to its DCF range. With no implied price given and NTAP already near the upper end of its historical band, the current price appears to be discounting quality more than near-term re-rating potential.
Supporting Metrics
