Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: NOW stock price vs META: inconclusive — current versus $46.93 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at META's multiple
Implied fair value · at NOW's multiple
Needs NOW P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
ServiceNow, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Meta Platforms, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MICROSOFT CORP
NOW vs MSFT
ADOBE INC.
NOW vs ADBE
ORACLE CORP
NOW vs ORCL
Salesforce, Inc.
NOW vs CRM
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
NOW vs IBM
Paycom Software, Inc.
NOW vs PAYC
Apple Inc.
NOW vs AAPL
AMAZON COM INC
NOW vs AMZN
NVIDIA CORP
NOW vs NVDA
Alphabet Inc.
NOW vs GOOGL
Snap Inc
NOW vs SNAP
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe NOW can sustain premium growth while meaningfully expanding margins and ROIC above current levels, then hold or buy selectively because the main justification for the rich multiple would be execution improvement; otherwise, the data favors reducing exposure because NOW is valued well above both META-implied and DCF ranges.
NOW trades at a materially higher multiple than META on earnings, EBITDA, revenue, and sales despite a much smaller scale. The model also shows a -57.8% downside to the implied P/E price of $46.93, highlighting how stretched the current price is versus META-based valuation.
Supporting Metrics
