Nomad Foods Limited
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- +$3.58B
- Cash
- −$369.40M
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: NOMD stock price vs QLYS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at QLYS's multiple
Needs QLYS P/E.
Implied fair value · at NOMD's multiple
Needs NOMD P/E.
Metric by metric
Live quote
Price unavailable
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: NOMD FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025) · QLYS FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025).
Trendline
Five fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Price framework
Discounted free cash flow, then bridged to a per-share price. Same assumptions applied to both companies.
Nomad Foods Limited · implied price per share
Bear
-$20.15
Base
-$23.70
Bull
-$27.26
Qualys, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$67.22
Base
$79.08
Bull
$90.94
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
—
0.13x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
23.48x
-1.42x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$369.40M
$461.59M
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
$3.58B
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MCCORMICK & CO INC
NOMD vs MKC
TYSON FOODS, INC.
NOMD vs TSN
Post Holdings, Inc.
NOMD vs POST
Kraft Heinz Co
NOMD vs KHC
GENERAL MILLS INC
NOMD vs GIS
HORMEL FOODS CORP /DE/
NOMD vs HRL
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
NOMD vs CRWD
Okta, Inc.
NOMD vs OKTA
Gen Digital Inc.
NOMD vs GEN
Palo Alto Networks Inc
NOMD vs PANW
Fortinet, Inc.
NOMD vs FTNT
Zscaler, Inc.
NOMD vs ZS
$72.57M
Live quote
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
If you believe NOMD can materially improve margins, reverse revenue decline, and reduce leverage toward QLYS-like levels, then consider the name; otherwise, QLYS is the higher-quality business and NOMD's apparent cheapness is likely a value trap because its fundamentals are much weaker than QLYS's.
NOMD trades at 10.9x P/E versus 27.2x for QLYS, so it looks cheaper on earnings, but the discount is consistent with its weaker operating profile. On a revenue basis, NOMD is also cheaper at 0.5x P/S versus 7.8x for QLYS, yet the gap is not compelling enough to offset the much lower quality and growth.
Supporting Metrics