National Fuel Gas Co
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- +$2.83B
- Cash
- −$43.17M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: NFG stock price vs CRM: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CRM's multiple
Needs CRM P/E.
Implied fair value · at NFG's multiple
Needs NFG P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO · implied price per share
Bear
-$9.77
Base
-$6.10
Bull
-$1.32
Salesforce, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
NRG ENERGY, INC.
NFG vs NRG
SPIRE INC
NFG vs SR
PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INC
NFG vs PEG
DTE ENERGY CO
NFG vs DTE
PG&E Corp
NFG vs PCG
UGI CORP /PA/
NFG vs UGI
MICROSOFT CORP
NFG vs MSFT
ORACLE CORP
NFG vs ORCL
ADOBE INC.
NFG vs ADBE
Workday, Inc.
NFG vs WDAY
INTUIT INC.
NFG vs INTU
Paycom Software, Inc.
NFG vs PAYC
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe NFG can sustain its stronger margins and 17.1% revenue growth without leverage becoming a burden, then NFG looks attractive at the current price because it trades at 13.9x P/E versus CRM’s 24.7x and sits within both the historical and DCF valuation bands.
On the provided P/E comparison, NFG screens much cheaper than CRM at 13.9x versus 24.7x, which maps to the stated implied upside of 78.1%. However, the valuation picture is mixed because NFG trades at a higher EV/Revenue than CRM despite the lower P/E, suggesting the discount is driven more by earnings power and capital structure than top-line multiple.
Supporting Metrics