Nextera Energy Inc
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- +$95.01B
- Cash
- −$2.81B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: NEE stock price vs DUK: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at DUK's multiple
Needs DUK P/E.
Implied fair value · at NEE's multiple
Needs NEE P/E.
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
NEXTERA ENERGY INC · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Duke Energy CORP · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
DTE ENERGY CO
NEE vs DTE
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe NEE can sustain its higher growth and margin advantage without worsening leverage, then hold or accumulate selectively; otherwise, the current premium versus DUK looks hard to justify given the weak quality scores and higher net debt burden.
NEE trades at a clear premium to DUK on every provided valuation metric, especially EV/EBITDA and EV/Revenue, which helps explain why the implied P/E price is well below the current price. The premium is offset somewhat by NEE's stronger growth and profitability, but the stock still sits above both DUK-implied range and the DCF range.
Supporting Metrics