Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: NET stock price vs LDOS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at LDOS's multiple
Needs Revenue / share, LDOS P/S.
Implied fair value · at NET's multiple
Needs NET P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Ten period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Cloudflare, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Leidos Holdings, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES INC
NET vs AKAM
Zscaler, Inc.
NET vs ZS
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
NET vs CRWD
Datadog, Inc.
NET vs DDOG
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
NET vs IBM
Accenture plc
NET vs ACN
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
NET vs LMT
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP /DE/
NET vs NOC
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP
NET vs GD
ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORP
NET vs ZBRA
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe NET can sustain ~30% revenue growth and translate its 74.5% gross margin into durable operating profitability, then hold only with caution; otherwise, the data argue for reducing exposure because the stock is priced far above both LDOS and NET’s own implied valuation range.
NET trades at a massive premium to LDOS on both revenue and earnings-based valuation measures, while the model’s LDOS-implied value is far below the current price. The gap is driven by NET’s much faster revenue growth and superior gross margin, but the implied downside remains extreme versus LDOS anchor.
Supporting Metrics
