Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: NET stock price vs CRM: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CRM's multiple
Needs Revenue / share, CRM P/S.
Implied fair value · at NET's multiple
Needs NET P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Cloudflare, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Salesforce, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES INC
NET vs AKAM
Zscaler, Inc.
NET vs ZS
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
NET vs CRWD
Datadog, Inc.
NET vs DDOG
MICROSOFT CORP
NET vs MSFT
ORACLE CORP
NET vs ORCL
ADOBE INC.
NET vs ADBE
Workday, Inc.
NET vs WDAY
INTUIT INC.
NET vs INTU
Paycom Software, Inc.
NET vs PAYC
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe NET can sustain 29.8% revenue growth while rapidly converting that growth into positive operating and net margins, then consider only a cautious long; otherwise, the data favors avoiding or reducing exposure because NET trades at a far higher P/S and EV/Revenue multiple than CRM despite materially weaker profitability.
NET trades at a massive premium to CRM despite a valuation model implying a far lower price of $23.68 versus the current $292.96, or -91.9% downside. The gap is driven by NET’s much richer sales and earnings multiples, especially a 47.1x P/S and 46.6x EV/Revenue versus CRM’s 3.8x P/S and 4.0x EV/Revenue.
Supporting Metrics
