NeoGenomics, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$159.62M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: NEO stock price vs AZZ: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AZZ's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, AZZ P/E.
Implied fair value · at NEO's multiple
Needs NEO P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
15 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
NeoGenomics, Inc. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
AZZ Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
LABCORP HOLDINGS INC.
NEO vs LH
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INC
NEO vs DGX
OPKO HEALTH, INC.
NEO vs OPK
Guardant Health, Inc.
NEO vs GH
Natera, Inc.
NEO vs NTRA
EXACT SCIENCES CORP
NEO vs EXAS
VALMONT INDUSTRIES INC
NEO vs VMI
SMITH A O CORP
NEO vs AOS
PPG INDUSTRIES INC
NEO vs PPG
Fabrinet
NEO vs FN
WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC.
NEO vs WOR
STEEL DYNAMICS INC
NEO vs STLD
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
The deterministic comparison remains available. Sign in when you want an on-demand narrative synthesis of the same data.