Vail Resorts, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$231.35M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MTN stock price vs INTC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at INTC's multiple
Needs INTC P/E.
Implied fair value · at MTN's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative, MTN P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Capital structure 81% equity / 19% debt · EV / Revenue 4.32x · EV proxy / EBITDA proxy 24.07x
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
VAIL RESORTS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Intel Corporation · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp
MTN vs VAC
CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL INC /DE
MTN vs CHH
Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.
MTN vs MODG
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
MTN vs LYV
NVIDIA Corporation
MTN vs NVDA
QUALCOMM Incorporated
MTN vs QCOM
Broadcom Inc.
MTN vs AVGO
Texas Instruments Incorporated
MTN vs TXN
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MTN’s stronger margin profile and ROIC can persist without a material balance-sheet setback, then MTN looks attractive versus INTC because INTC-based valuation implies substantial upside from a much lower multiple base.
MTN trades far below INTC-implied value range of $716.11-$745.37 versus the current price of $149.38, implying a very large discount on a relative basis. The gap is driven by MTN’s much lower P/S and EV/Revenue multiples than INTC, despite MTN having better margins and returns.
Supporting Metrics