Vail Resorts, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$231.35M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MTN stock price vs CSCO: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CSCO's multiple
Needs CSCO P/E.
Implied fair value · at MTN's multiple
Needs MTN P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
VAIL RESORTS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$32.30
Base
$38.62
Bull
$46.85
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp
MTN vs VAC
CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL INC /DE
MTN vs CHH
Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.
MTN vs MODG
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
MTN vs LYV
CIENA CORP
MTN vs CIEN
Palo Alto Networks Inc
MTN vs PANW
JUNIPER NETWORKS INC
MTN vs JNPR
Fortinet, Inc.
MTN vs FTNT
Arista Networks, Inc.
MTN vs ANET
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
MTN vs LDOS
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MTN can sustain its current margins while reducing leverage and avoiding a deterioration in Z-Score, then the stock looks attractive on a relative valuation basis because it trades well below CSCO-implied and DCF ranges.
MTN trades at $146.71 versus an implied price of $356.95, suggesting 143.3% upside on the stated P/E framework. The gap is driven by MTN's much lower P/E and sales multiples than CSCO, while its current price also sits below the low end of the DCF range and only slightly below the historical band.
Supporting Metrics