Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MTN stock price vs CHTR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CHTR's multiple
Needs CHTR P/E.
Implied fair value · at MTN's multiple
Needs MTN P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
VAIL RESORTS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Charter Communications, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp
MTN vs VAC
CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL INC /DE
MTN vs CHH
Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.
MTN vs MODG
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
MTN vs LYV
COMCAST CORP
MTN vs CMCSA
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
MTN vs LUMN
AT&T INC.
MTN vs T
T-Mobile US, Inc.
MTN vs TMUS
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
MTN vs VZ
Clearfield, Inc.
MTN vs CLFD
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MTN’s own historical band and DCF better reflect its value than a direct CHTR multiple comparison, then avoid treating CHTR-implied downside as a stand-alone sell signal because MTN still sits inside its historical range and below DCF valuation.
On a relative basis, MTN’s current price of $149.68 is far above CHTR-implied value of $31.78, implying a -78.8% gap if CHTR’s multiple is used directly. However, MTN is also trading inside its historical valuation band and below the DCF range, which argues that CHTR comparison may overstate downside.
Supporting Metrics
