Match Group, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$1.03B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MTCH stock price vs CRM: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CRM's multiple
Needs CRM P/E.
Implied fair value · at MTCH's multiple
Needs MTCH P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Match Group, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Salesforce, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Meta Platforms, Inc.
MTCH vs META
Snap Inc
MTCH vs SNAP
PINTEREST, INC.
MTCH vs PINS
VERISIGN INC/CA
MTCH vs VRSN
Apple Inc.
MTCH vs AAPL
NVIDIA CORP
MTCH vs NVDA
MICROSOFT CORP
MTCH vs MSFT
ORACLE CORP
MTCH vs ORCL
ADOBE INC.
MTCH vs ADBE
Workday, Inc.
MTCH vs WDAY
INTUIT INC.
MTCH vs INTU
Paycom Software, Inc.
MTCH vs PAYC
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MTCH can reaccelerate growth while maintaining its higher margin and ROIC profile, then buying MTCH looks attractive because it is valued below CRM on every major multiple and sits below the modeled implied price.
MTCH trades at a clear discount to CRM on P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue, despite the model implying 55.7% upside to $56.99. The stock also sits in the upper half of its historical band and within the DCF range, suggesting the current discount is meaningful but not extreme.
Supporting Metrics