Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MSTR stock price vs KR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at KR's multiple
Needs Revenue / share, KR P/S.
Implied fair value · at MSTR's multiple
Needs MSTR P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
STRATEGY INC · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
KROGER CO · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MICROSOFT CORP
MSTR vs MSFT
ORACLE CORP
MSTR vs ORCL
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
MSTR vs IBM
Salesforce, Inc.
MSTR vs CRM
Walmart Inc.
MSTR vs WMT
Costco Wholesale Corporation
MSTR vs COST
Target Corporation
MSTR vs TGT
Albertsons Companies, Inc.
MSTR vs ACI
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
MSTR vs SFM
DOLLAR GENERAL CORP
MSTR vs DG
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MSTR can sustain its extreme revenue multiple and eventually convert its high gross margin into positive operating and net income, then holding or buying may be justified; otherwise, the relative valuation versus KR argues for avoiding MSTR because the current price is far above KR-implied value and unsupported by profitability.
MSTR trades at a massive premium to KR despite a valuation model implying only $0.42 per share, or -99.6% downside from the current $100.77 price. The gap is driven by MSTR's extremely high sales multiples and negative earnings profile versus KR's low sales multiple and positive profitability.
Supporting Metrics
