Microsoft Corporation
$3.68T- Market cap
- $3.71T
- Debt
- +$49.52B
- Cash
- −$76.84B
Capital structure 99% equity / 1% debt · EV / Revenue 11.10x · EV / EBITDA 17.97x
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 ·
Decision snapshot: MSFT stock price at premium vs TMUS $499.70 current versus $335.21 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at TMUS's multiple
Implied fair value · at MSFT's multiple
Snapshot Sep 4, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Multiple premium
Premium justified
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: MSFT FY 2026 (ended Jun 30, 2026) · TMUS FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025). Fiscal years are not aligned.
Trendline
Six fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Capital structure 99% equity / 1% debt · EV / Revenue 11.10x · EV / EBITDA 17.97x
Capital structure 68% equity / 32% debt · EV / Revenue 3.18x · EV / EBITDA 14.64x
MSFT carries the larger enterprise value at $3.68T against $280.53B; TMUS trades on the lower EV / Revenue multiple (3.18x vs 11.10x); TMUS on the lower EV / EBITDA (14.64x vs 17.97x).
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
MICROSOFT CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
T-MOBILE US, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$75.82
Base
$105.53
Bull
$145.63
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
0.11x
1.54x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
-0.13x
4.48x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$76.84B
$5.60B
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Apple Inc.
MSFT vs AAPL
Alphabet Inc.
MSFT vs GOOGL
AMAZON COM INC
MSFT vs AMZN
ADOBE INC.
MSFT vs ADBE
NVIDIA CORP
MSFT vs NVDA
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
MSFT vs CSCO
AT&T INC.
MSFT vs T
COMCAST CORP
MSFT vs CMCSA
AMERICAN TOWER CORP /MA/
MSFT vs AMT
CROWN CASTLE INC.
MSFT vs CCI
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
MSFT vs VZ
Clearfield, Inc.
MSFT vs CLFD
$49.52B
$91.42B
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MSFT deserves a persistent premium to TMUS because of its much higher margins, growth, and ROIC, then hold or accumulate on weakness rather than chase the current level, because TMUS-implied valuation shows -31.4% downside even though MSFT's own fundamentals are clearly stronger.
On a P/E basis, the comparison implies MSFT should trade at $318.94 versus the current $464.72, or -31.4% downside, which indicates the market is already pricing MSFT above this TMUS-derived valuation. That said, MSFT's own historical band of $435.26 to $531.98 places the current price inside its recent range, suggesting TMUS multiple framework may understate MSFT's quality premium.
Supporting Metrics