Microsoft Corporation
$3.56T- Market cap
- $3.59T
- Debt
- +$49.52B
- Cash
- −$76.84B
Capital structure 99% equity / 1% debt · EV / Revenue 10.74x · EV / EBITDA 17.14x
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MSFT stock price vs MMC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MMC's multiple
Needs MMC P/E.
Implied fair value · at MSFT's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: MSFT FY 2026 (ended Jun 30, 2026) · MMC FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025). Fiscal years are not aligned.
Trendline
Six fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Capital structure 99% equity / 1% debt · EV / Revenue 10.74x · EV / EBITDA 17.14x
Price framework
Discounted free cash flow, then bridged to a per-share price. Same assumptions applied to both companies.
MICROSOFT CORPORATION · implied price per share
Bear
$216.80
Base
$255.06
Bull
$293.32
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$107.89
Base
$126.93
Bull
$145.97
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
0.11x
0.38x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
-0.13x
0.35x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$76.84B
$3.10B
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Apple Inc.
MSFT vs AAPL
Alphabet Inc.
MSFT vs GOOGL
AMAZON COM INC
MSFT vs AMZN
ADOBE INC.
MSFT vs ADBE
NVIDIA CORP
MSFT vs NVDA
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
MSFT vs CSCO
Aon plc
MSFT vs AON
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
MSFT vs AJG
BROWN & BROWN, INC.
MSFT vs BRO
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
MSFT vs AIG
Accenture plc
MSFT vs ACN
ROBERT HALF INC.
MSFT vs RHI
$49.52B
$5.82B
Live quote
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MSFT can sustain its 17.8% revenue growth and 46.8% operating margin, then a bullish stance is justified because its quality metrics and leverage profile are materially stronger than MMC’s, even though the current price remains above the DCF range.
MSFT trades at a premium operational profile versus MMC, but the comparison is incomplete because MMC has no listed valuation multiples in the provided data. MSFT’s current price of $464.72 sits within its historical band but far above the DCF range, suggesting the market is pricing in durability and scale rather than conservative intrinsic value.
Supporting Metrics
Live quote