Microsoft Corporation
$3.56T- Market cap
- $3.59T
- Debt
- +$49.52B
- Cash
- −$76.84B
Capital structure 99% equity / 1% debt · EV / Revenue 10.74x · EV / EBITDA 17.14x
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MSFT stock price vs HPE: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at HPE's multiple
Needs HPE P/E.
Implied fair value · at MSFT's multiple
Needs EPS (TTM) is negative.
Live quote
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: MSFT FY 2026 (ended Jun 30, 2026) · HPE FY 2025 (ended Oct 31, 2025). Fiscal years are not aligned.
Trendline
Six fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Capital structure 99% equity / 1% debt · EV / Revenue 10.74x · EV / EBITDA 17.14x
Price framework
Discounted free cash flow, then bridged to a per-share price. Same assumptions applied to both companies.
MICROSOFT CORPORATION · implied price per share
Bear
$216.80
Base
$255.06
Bull
$293.32
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY · implied price per share
Bear
$6.79
Base
$7.99
Bull
$9.19
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
0.11x
0.91x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
-0.13x
3.66x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$76.84B
$5.77B
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Apple Inc.
MSFT vs AAPL
Alphabet Inc.
MSFT vs GOOGL
AMAZON COM INC
MSFT vs AMZN
ADOBE INC.
MSFT vs ADBE
NVIDIA CORP
MSFT vs NVDA
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
MSFT vs CSCO
International Business Machines Corporation
MSFT vs IBM
JUNIPER NETWORKS INC
MSFT vs JNPR
Arista Networks, Inc.
MSFT vs ANET
NetApp, Inc.
MSFT vs NTAP
$49.52B
$22.40B
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MSFT deserves a structural premium for far superior margins, ROIC, and balance-sheet quality versus HPE, then avoid relying on HPE P/S implied downside and instead evaluate MSFT against its own historical and DCF ranges because the comp set is not economically comparable.
The P/S-based HPE comparison implies MSFT should trade far below the current price, with an implied value of $91.83 versus $499.99, or -81.6% downside. However, that gap likely reflects the weakness of using HPE as a comp for a much higher-quality, much more profitable software/platform business.
Supporting Metrics
Price unavailable