Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · View financials
Decision snapshot: MSFT stock price vs CHKP: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CHKP's multiple
Needs CHKP P/E.
Implied fair value · at MSFT's multiple
Needs Annual EPS.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
MICROSOFT CORP · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD. · implied price per share
The ordinary-share to listed-security ratio could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Apple Inc.
MSFT vs AAPL
Alphabet Inc.
MSFT vs GOOGL
AMAZON COM INC
MSFT vs AMZN
ADOBE INC.
MSFT vs ADBE
NVIDIA CORP
MSFT vs NVDA
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
MSFT vs CSCO
Palo Alto Networks Inc
MSFT vs PANW
Fortinet, Inc.
MSFT vs FTNT
Zscaler, Inc.
MSFT vs ZS
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
MSFT vs CRWD
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MSFT can continue sustaining 17.8% revenue growth and 37.4% ROIC while preserving its premium multiple, then holding or accumulating on pullbacks makes sense because the operating quality is clearly stronger than CHKP despite the valuation gap.
MSFT’s current price of $499.99 is materially above CHKP-implied price of $238.50, indicating a large relative valuation premium versus CHKP. The gap is partly supported by stronger growth and profitability, but the downside estimate of -52.3% means the market is still pricing in a much richer multiple than CHKP framework supports.
Supporting Metrics
