Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MPW stock price vs AIV: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AIV's multiple
Needs AIV P/S.
Implied fair value · at MPW's multiple
Needs MPW P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
16 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST INC · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Apartment Investment and Management Company · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc.
MPW vs SBRA
WELLTOWER INC.
MPW vs WELL
Ventas, Inc.
MPW vs VTR
NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS INC
MPW vs NHI
OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS INC
MPW vs OHI
LTC PROPERTIES INC
MPW vs LTC
MID AMERICA APARTMENT COMMUNITIES INC.
MPW vs MAA
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES INC
MPW vs AVB
UDR, Inc.
MPW vs UDR
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
MPW vs CPT
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC.
MPW vs ESS
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MPW can stabilize earnings and reduce leverage while sustaining its $972.0M revenue base, then a selective value position may be justified because AIV-implied $5.00 anchor sits above the DCF range of $3.09 to $4.18; otherwise, the weak profitability and 33.7x net debt/EBITDA argue for caution.
On the provided AIV-implied basis, MPW is anchored to an implied price of $5.00, while the DCF range is lower at $3.09 to $4.18, suggesting the market reference point is above intrinsic value estimates. The gap appears driven more by relative valuation mechanics than by clean operating outperformance, since MPW still shows negative net income and weak recent growth.
Supporting Metrics
