Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MP stock price vs GILD: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at GILD's multiple
Needs GILD P/S.
Implied fair value · at MP's multiple
Needs MP P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
MP Materials Corp. / DE · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
ALBEMARLE CORP
MP vs ALB
SOUTHERN COPPER CORP/
MP vs SCCO
Alcoa Corp
MP vs AA
KAISER ALUMINUM CORP
MP vs KALU
AbbVie Inc.
MP vs ABBV
AMGEN INC
MP vs AMGN
BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO
MP vs BMY
Merck & Co., Inc.
MP vs MRK
PFIZER INC
MP vs PFE
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
MP vs REGN
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MP can rapidly convert revenue growth into sustained positive margins and materially improve capital efficiency, then avoid treating the stock as a value opportunity today because the current multiple already embeds a large premium versus GILD despite much weaker profitability and quality metrics.
MP’s current price of $54.30 sits well above GILD-implied value of $6.69, implying -87.7% downside on the stated P/S-based framework. The gap is driven by MP’s extremely rich revenue multiple versus GILD and by MP’s weak profitability profile, which makes the comparison particularly unfavorable.
Supporting Metrics
