Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MP stock price vs CL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CL's multiple
Needs CL P/S.
Implied fair value · at MP's multiple
Needs MP P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
MP Materials Corp. / DE · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
ALBEMARLE CORP
MP vs ALB
SOUTHERN COPPER CORP/
MP vs SCCO
Alcoa Corp
MP vs AA
KAISER ALUMINUM CORP
MP vs KALU
PROCTER & GAMBLE Co
MP vs PG
JOHNSON & JOHNSON
MP vs JNJ
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO INC /DE/
MP vs CHD
KIMBERLY CLARK CORP
MP vs KMB
EDGEWELL PERSONAL CARE Co
MP vs EPC
UNILEVER PLC
MP vs UL
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MP can rapidly and sustainably improve margins from deeply negative levels toward profitability, then avoid relying on CL-implied P/S valuation alone; otherwise, the data favor reducing exposure or avoiding MP because its current price is far above CL-supported value and fundamentals remain materially weaker than CL's.
MP's current price of $57.18 sits far above CL-implied value of $4.43, implying -92.2% downside on the provided P/S-based framework. The gap is driven by MP's much richer sales multiples, while CL has the stronger profitability and returns profile.
Supporting Metrics
