Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MMS stock price vs TM: inconclusive — current versus $50.54 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at TM's multiple
Implied fair value · at MMS's multiple
Needs MMS P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
USD conversion input: 1 JPY = 0.006490 USD. FX date unavailable.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Maximus, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
TOYOTA MOTOR CORP/ · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Accenture plc
MMS vs ACN
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
MMS vs IBM
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC /DE/
MMS vs CACI
ROLLINS INC
MMS vs ROL
CINTAS CORP
MMS vs CTAS
IRON MOUNTAIN INC
MMS vs IRM
FORD MOTOR CO
MMS vs F
General Motors Co
MMS vs GM
Tesla, Inc.
MMS vs TSLA
HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
MMS vs HMC
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MMS can sustain its current profitability and quality metrics while the DCF range proves more relevant than the P/E-implied price, then holding or adding selectively makes sense because MMS has strong ROIC and an 8/9 Piotroski F-Score despite trading only modestly above the P/E-derived value.
MMS trades at $55.75 versus a P/E-implied price of $52.82, implying 5.2% downside on that framework. However, MMS also sits within its historical band and near the middle-to-upper part of that range, while the DCF range suggests materially higher intrinsic value than the market price.
Supporting Metrics
