Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MMS stock price vs AME: inconclusive — current versus $201.67 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AME's multiple
Implied fair value · at MMS's multiple
Needs MMS P/E.
Snapshot Sep 10, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Capital structure 96% equity / 4% debt · EV / Revenue 7.50x · EV proxy / EBITDA proxy 23.80x
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Maximus, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
AMETEK, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$96.00
Base
$117.55
Bull
$147.28
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Accenture plc
MMS vs ACN
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
MMS vs IBM
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC /DE/
MMS vs CACI
ROLLINS INC
MMS vs ROL
CINTAS CORP
MMS vs CTAS
IRON MOUNTAIN INC
MMS vs IRM
Parker-Hannifin Corp
MMS vs PH
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
MMS vs HON
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO
MMS vs EMR
CURTISS WRIGHT CORP
MMS vs CW
Avery Dennison Corp
MMS vs AVY
METTLER TOLEDO INTERNATIONAL INC/
MMS vs MTD
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MMS can sustain its strong capital efficiency while narrowing the margin gap versus AME, then MMS could rerate meaningfully because it already trades at a deep valuation discount despite strong quality scores; if not, the discount likely reflects a justified lower-quality profitability profile.
MMS trades at a steep discount to AME on earnings, sales, and EV-based multiples, while the model’s P/E-derived implied price suggests substantial upside. However, AME comparison is complicated by AME’s materially stronger profitability and growth profile, which supports a higher multiple than MMS.
Supporting Metrics
