Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MHK stock price vs DG: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at DG's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, DG P/E.
Implied fair value · at MHK's multiple
Needs MHK P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES INC · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
DOLLAR GENERAL CORP · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
MHK · not enough data.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
INTERFACE INC
MHK vs TILE
MASCO CORP /DE/
MHK vs MAS
RPM INTERNATIONAL INC/DE/
MHK vs RPM
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC
MHK vs MLM
Vulcan Materials CO
MHK vs VMC
Walmart Inc.
MHK vs WMT
Target Corporation
MHK vs TGT
Costco Wholesale Corporation
MHK vs COST
TJX COMPANIES INC /DE/
MHK vs TJX
ROSS STORES, INC.
MHK vs ROST
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MHK can reaccelerate growth and sustain its current EBITDA margin despite its weaker ROIC profile, then holding or selectively adding makes sense because the stock is only modestly below the P/E implied value but still within its historical valuation range.
MHK trades at $132.42 versus an implied price of $110.33 from the P/E framework, suggesting 16.7% downside on that basis. However, the stock is still within its historical band and near the upper end of the DCF range, so the valuation gap is real but not extreme.
Supporting Metrics
