Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MDB stock price vs ZBRA: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ZBRA's multiple
Needs ZBRA P/S.
Implied fair value · at MDB's multiple
Needs MDB P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
MONGODB, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Zebra Technologies Corporation · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MICROSOFT CORP
MDB vs MSFT
AMAZON COM INC
MDB vs AMZN
ORACLE CORP
MDB vs ORCL
Salesforce, Inc.
MDB vs CRM
NEXTERA ENERGY INC
MDB vs NEE
COGNEX CORP
MDB vs CGNX
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
MDB vs WBA
Avery Dennison Corp
MDB vs AVY
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
MDB vs LDOS
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
MDB vs MU
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MDB can convert its 22.8% revenue growth and 71.7% gross margin into sustained operating profitability, then hold or selectively own it; otherwise, the data favors reducing exposure because MDB trades at 11.0x P/S and 10.6x EV/Revenue versus a much cheaper, profitable ZBRA.
MDB’s current price of $335.55 sits far above ZBRA-implied value of $65.93, implying an 80.4% downside under the stated P/S comparison. The gap is driven by MDB’s much richer sales multiple versus ZBRA, with MDB trading at 11.0x P/S and 10.6x EV/Revenue versus ZBRA at 2.2x P/S and 2.6x EV/Revenue.
Supporting Metrics
