Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MDB stock price vs CSCO: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CSCO's multiple
Needs CSCO P/S.
Implied fair value · at MDB's multiple
Needs MDB P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
MONGODB, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$32.30
Base
$38.62
Bull
$46.85
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MICROSOFT CORP
MDB vs MSFT
AMAZON COM INC
MDB vs AMZN
ORACLE CORP
MDB vs ORCL
Salesforce, Inc.
MDB vs CRM
CIENA CORP
MDB vs CIEN
Palo Alto Networks Inc
MDB vs PANW
JUNIPER NETWORKS INC
MDB vs JNPR
Fortinet, Inc.
MDB vs FTNT
Arista Networks, Inc.
MDB vs ANET
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
MDB vs LDOS
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MDB can convert its 22.8% revenue growth and 71.7% gross margin into sustained operating profitability, then hold or buy selectively; otherwise, the 35.0% downside to CSCO-implied value argues for caution because MDB is still loss-making while CSCO is already strongly profitable.
MDB trades well above CSCO-implied value of $258.40, implying -35.0% downside from the current price of $397.49. The gap is driven by MDB's much higher revenue growth, but the market is also paying up for a business with negative operating profitability and a far richer sales multiple than CSCO.
Supporting Metrics
