Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MCHP stock price vs ITW: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ITW's multiple
Needs ITW P/E.
Implied fair value · at MCHP's multiple
Needs MCHP P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC · implied price per share
Bear
$71.88
Base
$86.99
Bull
$109.51
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
INTEL CORP
MCHP vs INTC
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
MCHP vs TXN
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
MCHP vs AMD
QUALCOMM INC/DE
MCHP vs QCOM
APPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE
MCHP vs AMAT
SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS, INC.
MCHP vs SWKS
3M Company
MCHP vs MMM
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
MCHP vs HON
General Electric Company
MCHP vs GE
Parker-Hannifin Corp
MCHP vs PH
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MCHP can materially improve operating margin and ROIC while sustaining above-ITW growth, then hold or accumulate selectively; otherwise, the data argue for underweighting or avoiding MCHP because its valuation is far above ITW and its profitability and leverage profile are weaker.
MCHP trades at a steep premium to ITW on both earnings and sales bases, yet the implied price from ITW P/E comparison is far below the current price. The gap is driven by MCHP’s much higher P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue multiples rather than superior profitability or returns.
Supporting Metrics
