Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MCD stock price vs BLMN: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at BLMN's multiple
Needs BLMN P/E.
Implied fair value · at MCD's multiple
Needs MCD P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
McDONALD’S CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Starbucks Corporation
MCD vs SBUX
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
MCD vs CMG
Yum! Brands, Inc.
MCD vs YUM
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
MCD vs QSR
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC
MCD vs EAT
CHEESECAKE FACTORY INC
MCD vs CAKE
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
MCD vs TXRH
BJs RESTAURANTS INC
MCD vs BJRI
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC
MCD vs CBRL
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MCD’s premium profitability and ROIC are durable and BLMN is a weak valuation anchor, then avoid relying on BLMN-implied upside alone and use the DCF/historical band as a more conservative entry guide because MCD already trades above its DCF range while BLMN comparison is skewed by BLMN’s low-quality earnings base.
The model implies MCD at $1,034.87 versus a current price of $270.64, an apparent 282.4% upside, but that result is driven by a BLMN-based multiple framework that may be distorted by BLMN’s weak operating profile. MCD also trades above its DCF range and near the top of its historical band, so the valuation picture is not as cheap as BLMN-implied number suggests.
Supporting Metrics
