Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MAC stock price vs UNFI: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at UNFI's multiple
Needs UNFI P/S.
Implied fair value · at MAC's multiple
Needs MAC P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
MACERICH CO · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
United Natural Foods, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP INC /DE/
MAC vs SPG
KIMCO REALTY CORP
MAC vs KIM
Brixmor Property Group Inc.
MAC vs BRX
REGENCY CENTERS CORP
MAC vs REG
FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST
MAC vs FRT
Performance Food Group Co
MAC vs PFGC
SYSCO CORP
MAC vs SYY
Grocery Outlet Holding Corp.
MAC vs GO
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
MAC vs SFM
TreeHouse Foods, Inc.
MAC vs THS
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MAC can sustain its current revenue growth while materially improving profitability and deleveraging, then hold off on assuming UNFI-based valuation gap is justified; otherwise, the current price looks difficult to defend because the stock trades far above both DCF and UNFI sales-based benchmarks despite weaker leverage and quality metrics.
MAC’s current price of $25.46 versus an implied price of $0.34 on the P/S basis implies a 98.7% downside, indicating a very large valuation disconnect. The gap is driven by MAC trading at 6.6x sales and 11.3x EV/revenue versus UNFI at 0.1x on both metrics, despite MAC’s weaker balance-sheet profile.
Supporting Metrics
