Macerich Co
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$280.25M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MAC stock price vs PAYC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PAYC's multiple
Needs PAYC P/S.
Implied fair value · at MAC's multiple
Needs MAC P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
MACERICH CO · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Paycom Software, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP INC /DE/
MAC vs SPG
KIMCO REALTY CORP
MAC vs KIM
Brixmor Property Group Inc.
MAC vs BRX
REGENCY CENTERS CORP
MAC vs REG
FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST
MAC vs FRT
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC
MAC vs ADP
PAYCHEX INC
MAC vs PAYX
INTUIT INC.
MAC vs INTU
Autodesk, Inc.
MAC vs ADSK
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC
MAC vs TYL
Salesforce, Inc.
MAC vs CRM
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MAC can materially improve profitability and reduce leverage without sacrificing growth, then the stock may deserve patience; otherwise, the data favor caution because MAC trades at richer multiples than PAYC despite weaker margins, losses, and much higher leverage.
MAC’s current price of $25.46 implies a -49.9% downside to the $12.77 P/S-implied value, indicating the market is already pricing in a severe discount relative to PAYC-based valuation framework. The disconnect is reinforced by MAC trading above PAYC-implied range and well above the DCF range, despite weaker fundamentals than PAYC.
Supporting Metrics