Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MAC stock price vs CG: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CG's multiple
Needs CG P/S.
Implied fair value · at MAC's multiple
Needs MAC P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
MACERICH CO · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Carlyle Group Inc. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP INC /DE/
MAC vs SPG
KIMCO REALTY CORP
MAC vs KIM
Brixmor Property Group Inc.
MAC vs BRX
REGENCY CENTERS CORP
MAC vs REG
FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST
MAC vs FRT
KKR & Co. Inc.
MAC vs KKR
Blackstone Inc.
MAC vs BX
TPG Inc.
MAC vs TPG
PRICE T ROWE GROUP INC
MAC vs TROW
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MAC can materially improve margins and de-lever its balance sheet faster than current results suggest, then the stock could justify a hold or selective long exposure because the present valuation still implies significant downside versus CG- and DCF-based ranges.
MAC's current price of $25.46 is well above the implied price of $12.74 from the P/S framework, indicating about 49.9% downside. The gap is driven by MAC trading at a much richer EV/EBITDA and EV/Revenue than CG despite weaker earnings quality and balance sheet metrics.
Supporting Metrics
Edwyn research
