Macy's, Inc.
—- Market cap
- $5.35B
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$1.25B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · Mkt cap
Decision snapshot: M stock price at discount vs GPC $20.50 current versus $662.24 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at GPC's multiple
Implied fair value · at M's multiple
Snapshot Sep 10, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Lower P/E
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
16 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Macy's, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
GENUINE PARTS CO · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
TJX COMPANIES INC /DE/
M vs TJX
ROSS STORES, INC.
M vs ROST
KOHLS Corp
M vs KSS
NORDSTROM INC
M vs JWN
DILLARD'S, INC.
M vs DDS
Burlington Stores, Inc.
M vs BURL
BORGWARNER INC
M vs BWA
FORD MOTOR CO
M vs F
Tesla, Inc.
M vs TSLA
LKQ CORP
M vs LKQ
COPART INC
M vs CPRT
HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC.
M vs HOG
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe M can stabilize revenue while preserving its stronger margin and leverage profile, then M looks attractive versus GPC because it trades at far lower P/E and EV/EBITDA multiples despite better profitability and balance sheet metrics.
On a P/E basis, M appears dramatically cheaper than GPC at 10.7x versus 264.6x, which mechanically drives the very large implied upside in the screen. However, that gap is less persuasive on an absolute-quality basis because GPC also screens much more expensive on EV/EBITDA at 47.7x versus M at 5.1x, while M is still inside its historical price band.
Supporting Metrics