Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: LYFT stock price vs KO: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at KO's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, KO P/E.
Implied fair value · at LYFT's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, LYFT P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Lyft, Inc. · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
COCA COLA CO · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
LYFT · not enough data.
KO · not enough data.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Uber Technologies, Inc
LYFT vs UBER
Airbnb, Inc.
LYFT vs ABNB
Booking Holdings Inc.
LYFT vs BKNG
DoorDash, Inc.
LYFT vs DASH
Grab Holdings Ltd
LYFT vs GRAB
TaskUs, Inc.
LYFT vs TASK
PEPSICO INC
LYFT vs PEP
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
LYFT vs KDP
Monster Beverage Corp
LYFT vs MNST
NATIONAL BEVERAGE CORP
LYFT vs FIZZ
MOLSON COORS BEVERAGE CO
LYFT vs TAP
HERSHEY CO
LYFT vs HSY
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe LYFT can sustain revenue growth while materially improving operating margin and ROIC, then the stock can be attractive on a discounted revenue-multiple basis; otherwise, KO remains the higher-quality business because its premium valuation is supported by much stronger profitability and returns.
LYFT trades at 1.0x P/S and 0.8x EV/Revenue versus KO at 7.9x P/S and 8.5x EV/Revenue, so the market is already assigning LYFT a much lower revenue multiple. The stated P/E-based implied price of $196.21 versus the current $15.86 suggests extreme upside on paper, but that signal is not reliable given the rest of the profitability data.
Supporting Metrics
