Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: LYFT stock price vs EXPD: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at EXPD's multiple
Needs EXPD P/E.
Implied fair value · at LYFT's multiple
Needs LYFT P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
13 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Lyft, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Uber Technologies, Inc
LYFT vs UBER
Airbnb, Inc.
LYFT vs ABNB
Booking Holdings Inc.
LYFT vs BKNG
DoorDash, Inc.
LYFT vs DASH
Grab Holdings Ltd
LYFT vs GRAB
TaskUs, Inc.
LYFT vs TASK
C. H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
LYFT vs CHRW
HUNT J B TRANSPORT SERVICES INC
LYFT vs JBHT
FEDEX CORP
LYFT vs FDX
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
LYFT vs UPS
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe LYFT can sustain its 9.2% revenue growth while converting gross margin into positive operating margin and improving its F-Score/Altman Z-Score, then the stock can be considered for a value-oriented entry; otherwise, the low multiples are more likely a reflection of weak earnings quality than an attractive rerating opportunity.
LYFT trades at a steep discount to EXPD on P/E, P/S, and EV/Revenue, but the comparison is distorted by LYFT's very different earnings profile and exceptionally high EV/EBITDA. The implied price of $192.16 versus the current price of $15.86 reflects a mechanical multiple-based gap, not a clear fundamental rerating case.
Supporting Metrics
