Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: LYFT stock price vs DRI: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at DRI's multiple
Needs DRI P/E.
Implied fair value · at LYFT's multiple
Needs LYFT P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Lyft, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Uber Technologies, Inc
LYFT vs UBER
Airbnb, Inc.
LYFT vs ABNB
Booking Holdings Inc.
LYFT vs BKNG
DoorDash, Inc.
LYFT vs DASH
Grab Holdings Ltd
LYFT vs GRAB
TaskUs, Inc.
LYFT vs TASK
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC
LYFT vs EAT
CHEESECAKE FACTORY INC
LYFT vs CAKE
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
LYFT vs TXRH
DOMINOS PIZZA INC
LYFT vs DPZ
McDonald's Corporation
LYFT vs MCD
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe LYFT can convert its 41.5% gross margin into sustained positive operating margins and improve its quality scores, then LYFT can be a value opportunity because it trades at 2.3x P/E and 1.0x P/S versus DRI's richer multiples; otherwise, the stock looks like a low-multiple name with weak fundamental support.
LYFT trades at a much lower earnings and sales multiple than DRI, but the comparison is distorted by LYFT's weak profitability and unusually negative EBITDA-based valuation. The model implies huge upside to DRI-based P/E price, yet LYFT is already near the top of its own historical band, which limits the usefulness of that DRI-implied LYFT.
Supporting Metrics
