Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: LYFT stock price vs AMZN: inconclusive — current versus $219.23 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AMZN's multiple
Implied fair value · at LYFT's multiple
Needs LYFT P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
11 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Lyft, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
AMAZON.COM, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Uber Technologies, Inc
LYFT vs UBER
Airbnb, Inc.
LYFT vs ABNB
Booking Holdings Inc.
LYFT vs BKNG
DoorDash, Inc.
LYFT vs DASH
Grab Holdings Ltd
LYFT vs GRAB
TaskUs, Inc.
LYFT vs TASK
Walmart Inc.
LYFT vs WMT
EBAY INC
LYFT vs EBAY
MICROSOFT CORP
LYFT vs MSFT
Alphabet Inc.
LYFT vs GOOGL
Apple Inc.
LYFT vs AAPL
TARGET CORP
LYFT vs TGT
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe LYFT can sustain revenue growth while converting its 41.5% gross margin into positive operating margin, then LYFT may deserve a higher multiple; otherwise, the current discount is justified by weak profitability and poor quality scores.
LYFT trades at 2.6x P/E and 1.0x P/S versus AMZN at 32.2x and 4.1x, which makes the stock look dramatically cheaper on traditional valuation measures. However, the implied price of $219.23 and upside of 1155.6% are not credible as a direct AMZN-based read-through because LYFT and AMZN have very different margin, scale, and business-model characteristics.
Supporting Metrics
