Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: LW stock price vs KO: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at KO's multiple
Needs KO P/E.
Implied fair value · at LW's multiple
Needs LW P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
LAMB WESTON HOLDINGS, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
-$1.21
Base
$3.48
Bull
$9.58
COCA COLA CO · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
CONAGRA BRANDS INC.
LW vs CAG
Nomad Foods Ltd
LW vs NOMD
TYSON FOODS, INC.
LW vs TSN
KELLANOVA
LW vs K
CAMPBELL'S Co
LW vs CPB
FLOWERS FOODS INC
LW vs FLO
PEPSICO INC
LW vs PEP
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
LW vs KDP
Monster Beverage Corp
LW vs MNST
NATIONAL BEVERAGE CORP
LW vs FIZZ
MOLSON COORS BEVERAGE CO
LW vs TAP
HERSHEY CO
LW vs HSY
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe LW can sustain margin improvement and reduce leverage without sacrificing growth, then a modest long position is reasonable because KO P/E framework implies 12.2% upside to $59.43; otherwise, the DCF range and weaker profitability versus KO argue for caution.
LW’s current price of $52.99 sits below KO-implied P/E value of $59.43, suggesting about 12.2% upside on that framework. However, the valuation case is mixed because LW also screens cheap on revenue and EBITDA multiples versus KO, while its DCF range implies a materially lower value.
Supporting Metrics
