Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: LOW stock price vs AIZ: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AIZ's multiple
Needs AIZ P/E.
Implied fair value · at LOW's multiple
Needs LOW P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
LOWES COMPANIES INC · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Assurant, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
HOME DEPOT, INC.
LOW vs HD
SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO
LOW vs SHW
WILLIAMS SONOMA INC
LOW vs WSM
Tractor Supply Company
LOW vs TSCO
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
LOW vs AIG
METLIFE INC
LOW vs MET
PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC
LOW vs PRU
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORP
LOW vs LNC
HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
LOW vs HIG
CNO Financial Group, Inc.
LOW vs CNO
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe LOW can sustain its stronger margin profile while reaccelerating growth enough to justify a higher multiple than AIZ, then holding or accumulating may make sense; otherwise, the current price looks stretched versus the P/E-derived implied value and the much lower DCF range.
LOW’s current price of $227.50 is 14.0% above the P/E-derived implied price of $195.62, suggesting the stock screens as expensive on that basis versus AIZ. However, LOW still sits inside its historical band and the relative valuation picture is mixed because it trades on richer multiples than AIZ despite stronger margins.
Supporting Metrics
Edwyn research
