Lockheed Martin Corporation
—- Market cap
- $121.04B
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$4.12B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: LMT stock price vs PH: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PH's multiple
Needs PH P/E.
Implied fair value · at LMT's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
17 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Parker-Hannifin Corp · implied price per share
Bear
$271.45
Base
$330.29
Bull
$406.93
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
BOEING CO
LMT vs BA
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP /DE/
LMT vs NOC
TEXTRON INC
LMT vs TXT
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC.
LMT vs HII
AXON ENTERPRISE, INC.
LMT vs AXON
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
LMT vs HWM
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
LMT vs HON
NORDSON CORP
LMT vs NDSN
Eaton Corp plc
LMT vs ETN
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO
LMT vs EMR
DANAHER CORP /DE/
LMT vs DHR
ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
LMT vs ITW
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe LMT can sustain its 5.6% revenue growth while improving margins closer to PH’s level, then a long position makes sense because the stock still screens below PH on P/E and far below PH on P/S; otherwise, the current price looks fair relative to LMT’s weaker profitability profile.
On a P/E basis, LMT trades at 27.1x versus PH at 36.0x, while the model implies $773.81 per share for LMT versus a current $582.74, or 32.8% upside. However, that apparent discount is offset by LMT’s materially lower sales, EBITDA, and net margins versus PH, which supports some of PH’s premium multiple.
Supporting Metrics