Lockheed Martin Corporation
—Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity (USD)
-$6.48B
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Net income / ending equity
74.6%
Net income / ending assets
8.4%
Efficiency ratio
—
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: LMT stock price vs MS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MS's multiple
Needs MS P/E.
Implied fair value · at LMT's multiple
Needs LMT P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Filter, sort, and scan the equity metrics that matter most for banks: book value, tangible book, returns, and operating efficiency.
Lower is better
Lower is better
Profitability edge
Asset efficiency edge
Lower is better
Statements
Reported bank earnings and balances, with each company’s reporting period shown.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
16 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
Tangible book and profitability anchor a bank, not enterprise value.
Deposits and cash-like balances distort enterprise value for banks, so this section reads equity value, tangible book and profitability instead.
Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity (USD)
-$6.48B
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Net income / ending equity
74.6%
Net income / ending assets
8.4%
Efficiency ratio
—
Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity (USD)
$88.90B
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Net income / ending equity
15.1%
Net income / ending assets
1.2%
Efficiency ratio
—
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
MORGAN STANLEY · implied price per share
Bank model off — standard DCF modelling is disabled for financial institutions.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider banking comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
BOEING CO
LMT vs BA
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP /DE/
LMT vs NOC
TEXTRON INC
LMT vs TXT
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC.
LMT vs HII
AXON ENTERPRISE, INC.
LMT vs AXON
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
LMT vs HWM
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
LMT vs GS
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
LMT vs JPM
Bank of America Corporation
LMT vs BAC
Citigroup Inc.
LMT vs C
SCHWAB CHARLES CORP
LMT vs SCHW
Wells Fargo & Company
LMT vs WFC
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe LMT can sustain strong ROIC and improve margins enough to close the profitability gap with MS, then hold or accumulate only on weakness; otherwise, the current valuation looks stretched because the P/E-based implied price and DCF range both sit well below the market price.
On the provided P/E basis, LMT’s implied value is $444.60 versus a current price of $586.29, indicating 24.2% downside. The stock also trades above the top of its historical band, while the DCF range is far below the market price, reinforcing a valuation gap that looks stretched relative to the supplied peers and intrinsic estimates.
Supporting Metrics