Lockheed Martin Corporation
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$4.12B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: LMT stock price vs BDC: inconclusive — current versus $444.56 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at BDC's multiple
Implied fair value · at LMT's multiple
Needs LMT P/E.
Snapshot Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
BELDEN INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
BOEING CO
LMT vs BA
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP /DE/
LMT vs NOC
TEXTRON INC
LMT vs TXT
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC.
LMT vs HII
AXON ENTERPRISE, INC.
LMT vs AXON
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
LMT vs HWM
CORNING INC /NY
LMT vs GLW
TE Connectivity plc
LMT vs TEL
nVent Electric plc
LMT vs NVT
AMETEK INC/
LMT vs AME
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe LMT can sustain its superior ROIC and defend its current earnings multiple despite slower growth and higher leverage, then hold rather than chase upside, because the P/E-based valuation points to downside while sales multiples and historical range suggest the stock is not clearly overextended.
LMT trades at $545.91 versus a P/E-derived implied price of $419.65, which suggests 23.1% downside on this framework. However, the market is not assigning a clear discount across all metrics because LMT’s P/S is in line with BDC and its EV/Revenue is actually slightly lower.
Supporting Metrics